Other pages & sections of our site:
[Home]  [Y-DNA]   [Contacts   [Groups]  [Haplogroups[Trees]  [Project Blog]  [Special]   [FAQ]

On this page:

Taylor Group R1b-064

This page is about the Taylor Y-DNA genetic family designated R1b-064, which is closely aligned with group R1b-066.

 

Members

Taylor Group R1b-064 Members
Kit #0
Tree
Name Earliest* known ancestor Hap
grp
Score **
LoHi
142947 Taylor William B. Taylor, (1809 NY - 1878 WI) R-L21 96.0% 100#
245734 Hoffman Ebenezer Taylor (~1740 ? - ~1806 ?) R-M269 96.0% 98.9%
256315 Taylor Roland Dilke Taylor (1510 ENG - 1555?) R-L21 98.9% 100%
266150 Taylor Robert Berry Taylor (~1830 MS - ~1895 Grimes Co, TX) R-M269   >80%
303672 Taylor R-L21   >80%
367832 Taylor Stephen Taylor (1818 TN - 1902 OK) R-M269    
364095 Carman ? R-M269 N/A N/A
402441 Taylor Stephen Taylor (ca1780 NY - 1814 Detroit, MI) R-M269
445680 Taylor Cornelius Taylor (1784 NY - 1848 MEX) R-M269   99.9%
R-U106 is in conflict with R-L21
183263 Taylor Andrew Judson Taylor (1836/7? PA - 1873 CA) R-U106 96.9% 99.8%

* Earliest = Most distant

Note: R-L21 and R-U106 are inconsistent and may indicate that this is NOT one genetic family but more than one.

Click on links to view trees. Each tree will open in a new window. Close, minimize or resize the window to return to this page.

About this Group

Members are invited to submit information about this Taylor genetic family.

Y-DNA Values

See http://www.familytreedna.com/public/taylorfamilygenes/default.aspx?section=yresults.

Go to Top

Genetic Network

With grateful thanks to McGee Utilities and Fluxus Engineering, we calculated the genetic network diagrams below.

Network diagram
Fluxus Network, 37 markers

Reading the Fluxus Network Diagram

The network diagram gives a pictorial representation of how members of this genetic family may be related. It depicts inferred genetic branches of the paternal lineage and may be helpful in documentary research.

Caveats
  1. The inference criterion used to build the diagram is maximum parsimony or "Occam's Razor". This criteria (fewest possible assumptions) may not be the most appropriate in all instances.
  2. The diagram is not proof; it is one interpretation of available geneitc data. Alternative interpretations may be possible.
  3. ySTR data is "noisy"; it contains some unexplained variability. .
Notes on the diagram:

Comment

The STR matches between conflicting haplogroups (R-L21 & R-U106) indicates that some of these matches may be coincidental, rather than indicating shared paternity. (R-M269 is upstream of both.) It is suggested that conflicts could be better delinatated, and perhaps resovled, with more STR and SNP testing.

TiP Scores

TiP general

TiP Scores Explained

TiP (for "Time Predictor") is a utility provided by Family Tree DNA. It is accessible to all FTDNA customers with Y-DNA results who have matches listed within the FTDNA reporting windows. It is also available to project administrators for calculating the probabilities that any two project members share a direct paternal ancestor within up to 24 generations.

TiP is superior to most TMRCA calculators. Rather than assume an average mutation rate for all markers compared, TiP uses individual marker mutation frequencies. Because marker mutation rates vary significantly between markers, the TiP scores 

As we use it here, TiP is a truer and simpler measure of genetic distances between individuals than other metrics such as the number of markers in disagreement or a sum of the differences (sometimes called "genetic distance"). TiP boils the complexities down to one number.

The composite TiP score is an index of how closely a member matches the entire group. Generally, the member with the highest score is the central member.

Note:

Unless stated otherwise, TiP probabilities are from TiP version 1 (v1) in effect from August 1, 2012 to December 11, 2012. Another version was in effect from December 12, 2012 to January 17, 2013 and was replaced with version 3 (v3) on January 18, 2013. We are in the process of updating to v3. In the meantime, we've made some observations about how v1 and v3 compare:
TiP scores R1b-64 & 66 - 11/23/2012
> > > > > > > > > > >
TiP Scores: 37 markers, 24 generations
GroupR1b-64R1b-64R1b-64R1b-64R1b-66R1b-66
Number245734142947256315183263_84436137152
245734  X0.96050.98940.96910.34960.8492
1429470.9605  X  0.99970.98890.31850.6480
2563150.98940.9997  X0.99790.51000.8122
1832630.96910.98890.9979  X0.37140.6949
Composite,
R1b-64
0.97310.9832 0.99570.9854 0.45520.8725
_844360.34960.31850.51000.3714  X0.8842
1371520.84920.64800.81220.69490.8842  X
Composite,
R1b-64 & 66
0.85840.8272 0.88250.8407 0.52980.7986

Genetic distance from other groups

Groups R1b-64 and R1b-66 are closely related, with about a 51% overall chance of sharing a common paternal ancestor within 24 generations. The most closely-related other groups in Taylor Family Genes are

R1b-66 is the 16th most closely related to R1b-04 with a 17% chance of sharing a common paternal ancestor within 24 generations and R1b-64 is the 22nd with a 10% chance. .

Go to Top

Revised 20 Nov 2015