Other pages & sections of our site:
[Home]  [Y-DNA]   [Contacts   [Groups]  [Haplogroups[Trees]  [Project Blog]  [Special]   [FAQ]

On this page:

 

Taylor Group R1b-036

This page is about the Taylor Y-DNA genetic family designated number R1b-036, its members, Y-DNA and other information.

R1b-033 is included because of its apparent close genetic association.

Members

Taylor Group R1b-036 Members
Kit #
Tree
Name Most distant known ancestor Hap
grp
Score **
LoHi
105576 Taylor Not submitted R-M269 >80% 99.8%
166012 Taylor John Taylor (1772 NC - 1836 AL) R-L193 >80% 99.8%
322576 Taylor William Taylor (~1768 - 1830 Butler Co, AL) R-M269   >80%

Taylor Group R1b-33 Members

Kit #
Tree
Name Most distant known ancestor Hap
grp
Score **
LoHi
_90340 Taylor Bryant Taylor (1800 NC - 1866 TX) R-L193 57.8% 100%
154174 Taylor Not submitted R-L193 57.8% 100%
N94559 Taylor Jacob Taylor (1760/65 ? - 1813 Posey, IN R-L193 85.0% 100%
182844 St. John Not submitted R-P311 57.8% 100%
299377 Taylor Andrew Kirby Taylor (1823 Rutherford, NC - 1906 Jackson, NC) R-L193   >80%

Click on links to view trees. Each tree will open in a new window. Close, minimize or resize the window to return to this page.

About this Group

Genetic family members are invited to share family history information for this page.

The members of these lineages are in haplogroup R-L193 (R1b1a2a1a2c1b2), a subclade of R-L21, indicating a probable origin in the British Isles.

This family appears to be closely related (genetically) to R1b-33.

Y-DNA Values

See http://www.familytreedna.com/public/taylorfamilygenes/default.aspx?section=yresults.



Group R1b-036: Haplogroup = R1b1a2

Markers #s 1 to 12
39339019391385
a
385b426388 439389
-1
392389
-2
 
Count22222222 2222
Mode1324141111111212 12131329
Markers #s 13 to 25
458459
a
459
b
455 454447437448 449464
a
464
b
464
c
464
d
 
Count22222222 22222
Mode17991111251519 3014151717
Markers #s 26 to 40
464
e
464
f
464
g
460GATA
H4
YCA
II a
YCA
II b
456607 576570 CDY
a
CDY
b
442 438
Count00111111 1111111
Mode - - 101119231616 17173941121211
Markers #s 41 to 54
531578395S1a395S1b590537 641472406S1511425413
a
413
b
557 
Count11111111 111111
Mode9151681010811 101223231610
Markers #s 55 to 69
594436490534450444481 520446617568487572640492
Count11111111 1111111
Mode121214812222012 1381312121212

Go to Top

Haplotype Rarity

Based on the values of the individual markers, the members of this genetic family score, on average, in the Uncommon range at 37 markers and Rare at 67. Their haplotypes are among the least common 25% to 5%.

TiP Scores

TiP general

TiP Scores Explained

TiP (for "Time Predictor") is a utility provided by Family Tree DNA. It is accessible to all FTDNA customers with Y-DNA results who have matches listed within the FTDNA reporting windows. It is also available to project administrators for calculating the probabilities that any two project members share a direct paternal ancestor within up to 24 generations.

TiP is superior to most TMRCA calculators. Rather than assume an average mutation rate for all markers compared, TiP uses individual marker mutation frequencies. Because marker mutation rates vary significantly between markers, the TiP scores 

As we use it here, TiP is a truer and simpler measure of genetic distances between individuals than other metrics such as the number of markers in disagreement or a sum of the differences (sometimes called "genetic distance"). TiP boils the complexities down to one number.

The composite TiP score is an index of how closely a member matches the entire group. Generally, the member with the highest score is the central member.

Note:

Unless stated otherwise, TiP probabilities are from TiP version 1 (v1) in effect from August 1, 2012 to December 11, 2012. Another version was in effect from December 12, 2012 to January 17, 2013 and was replaced with version 3 (v3) on January 18, 2013. We are in the process of updating to v3. In the meantime, we've made some observations about how v1 and v3 compare:
TiP Group R1b-36

Only one member of this group has tested 37 markers. TiP scores are considered unreliable.

Revised: 23 Jun 2015